CSC - Center for Science and Culture
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
I support an Old Earth view because of the overwhelming scientific evidence. It does no damage to my theology. But Macroevolution has some serious problems scientifically, even though it would not damage my theology either. Macroevolution feels so "scientific" and seems a convenient way to exclude God from the formula. This convenience is what draws people to it. The uninformed accept it because of its general popularity and "scientific" feel. The informed accept it because of its anti-God bias and ignore the science.
Possibly the Theory will be proven, but as more information appears across the scientific spectrum, the Macroevolutionary Theory further unravels. Usually bad news for a theory.
Comment by: BigHugeThing
No comments:
Post a Comment